We represented a client who worked as a social service manager and was accused of an error at work, receiving a final warning as a result. Despite this, the employer terminated her a month later for the same incident and contested her application for unemployment benefits. At the hearing, we successfully demonstrated that the employer lacked just cause for the termination, as our client had already been disciplined for the matter. As a result, she won her hearing and secured the benefits she deserved.

Our client was unfairly terminated after a co-worker directed obscenities toward him during a heated discussion. The employer’s HR director conducted a one-sided investigation, only speaking with the co-worker and relying solely on their statement. Our client was then fired for alleged unsatisfactory work performance, leading to a denial of his unemployment benefits. At the appeal hearing, we exposed the fundamental unfairness of the employer’s investigation and proved that our client’s termination was unjustified. The Hearing Officer agreed, ruling in our client’s favor and awarding him the benefits he rightfully deserved.

Our client's unemployment benefits were initially denied after the employer alleged just cause for termination due to falsifying records. However, our investigation proved that our client had done nothing wrong. At the appeal hearing, the Hearing Officer agreed, ruling in our client’s favor and awarding the unemployment benefits she rightfully deserved.

Our client was accused of briefly turning the wrong way onto a one-way street before correcting, but the police had no dash cam footage to support this claim. After his arrest for OVI, they alleged he provided a breath test over the legal limit. However, our investigation uncovered an error with the breath test machine. By challenging these issues, we secured a dismissal of the OVI charges, with our client pleading to a non-moving violation instead—protecting him from an OVI conviction, license points, and other serious penalties.

Our client was charged with an OVI based on little more than an officer’s suspicion of marijuana impairment. Knowing his rights, he declined a urine test, which would have only detected residual metabolites from past use rather than actual impairment. To complicate matters, law enforcement mistakenly claimed this was his second OVI. We clarified that this was not the case and challenged the lack of concrete evidence of impairment. As a result, the OVI charge was dismissed, and our client instead resolved the case with traffic citations—avoiding a one-year license suspension, an OVI conviction, and additional points on his record.

Our client, a dedicated restaurant manager, took a stand against workplace misconduct by reporting her supervisor’s on-the-job drinking. Instead of addressing the serious concern, her employer unjustly suspended and later terminated her, also attempting to deny her rightful unemployment benefits. The employer alleged complaints from other employees but failed to provide any evidence during the hearing. Recognizing the lack of just cause for termination, the hearing officer ruled in our client’s favor, securing her unemployment benefits.

At our client’s workplace, maintaining accurate quality control records was a critical responsibility. As a dedicated member of the quality control team, our client reviewed these records and made necessary corrections to ensure accuracy. However, rather than appreciating his diligence, the employer unjustly terminated him, alleging that he was altering reports rather than correcting them. With no evidence to support the claim and no prior disciplinary issues on his record, we fought for our client’s rights and won his unemployment benefits at the hearing.

Our client was involved in a single-vehicle accident and later drove home, where he visited with a neighbor and consumed alcohol after the incident. The police tracked his vehicle to his residence, conducted an interview, and ultimately charged him with a hit and skip, as well as an OVI. By meticulously gathering evidence and demonstrating to the prosecutor that the OVI charges were unwarranted due to intervening alcohol consumption after the accident, we successfully secured a complete dismissal of the OVI charges.

Our client, an Outside Sales Representative, faced an unjust termination after the employer introduced monthly sales quotas seven months into his employment. Despite the lack of clear communication at the time of hire, unreasonable and ever-changing goals were enforced, leading to disciplinary action and his eventual termination. When his unemployment benefits were denied, we stepped in to fight for his rights. At the hearing, we demonstrated that the employer's claims relied entirely on hearsay and that the quotas were neither reasonable nor properly disclosed. The hearing officer ruled in our client’s favor, and he was awarded his benefits.

Our client, employed as a recruiter, was abruptly terminated after approximately seventeen weeks on the job. The employer alleged that she failed to conduct a sufficient number of interviews each week. However, despite having evidence to support this claim, the employer did not follow its progressive discipline policy or provide any formal warning that her job performance was lacking or at risk. At the unemployment hearing, we successfully argued that the employer’s failure to provide notice or follow disciplinary procedures indicated a lack of procedural fairness. The hearing officer agreed, finding that while our client may not have met the employer’s expectations, the absence of warnings or notice demonstrated insufficient fault on her part. As a result, we secured a favorable decision for our client, confirming her eligibility for unemployment benefits.

When our client left their previous job to accept a promising new opportunity, they had no idea the decision would jeopardize their unemployment benefits later on. After working at the new job for several weeks, the position ended, leaving them without income. When they applied for unemployment benefits, they were denied on the grounds that quitting the first job constituted leaving without just cause. However, Ohio law clearly states that if a person quits a job to accept a new one, starts the new job within seven days, and works there for at least three weeks, the suspension of benefits from the first job should not apply. Armed with this law, we presented our case to the hearing officer, who agreed and approved our client’s benefits.

Our client, a dedicated hospital worker, was terminated under absurd circumstances after assisting a patient who had been waiting for an extended period. Despite her compassionate actions, the employer claimed she was "harassing" a coworker by prioritizing patient care. We presented a strong case, emphasizing the unreasonable nature of the employer's position. The hearing officer agreed, ruling in our client’s favor and approving her unemployment benefits.

When our client was stopped by police, he was informed that he was driving under a suspended license—an allegation he was completely unaware of. Upon investigation, we meticulously reviewed BMV records and identified critical issues with the notices sent by the BMV. Armed with these findings, we challenged the validity of the suspension, ultimately securing a complete dismissal of the DUS charges.

Our client was stopped for an alleged marked lanes violation, which led to an investigation and an OVI charge. Through diligent and aggressive representation, we challenged the case on procedural grounds and highlighted issues with missing discovery materials. As a result, the judge granted our administrative license suspension appeal, the OVI charges were dismissed, and our client resolved the matter with a non-moving violation. He left court with his license in hand, no points on his record, and no requirement to attend jail or driver intervention programs.

When our client was approached by police while parked lawfully on a street, a routine interaction escalated into an investigation and an OVI charge. Facing the severe consequences of an OVI conviction—mandatory penalties and a lasting mark on his record—he turned to us for help. Through a thorough examination of the facts, we successfully demonstrated to the prosecutor that the state lacked sufficient evidence to prove our client operated his vehicle while impaired. As a result, the OVI charges were dismissed, and our client accepted a plea to a non-moving violation, avoiding the harsh penalties of an OVI conviction.

In this case, our client was accused of committing marked lanes violations, which led to a traffic stop, despite the officer not personally witnessing any traffic infractions. Although our client cooperated with the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) eye test, she was unable to complete the remaining field sobriety tests due to her age (66) and physical limitations. A breath test later showed a result over the high-tier limit, but we focused on the fact that no traffic violations were observed by the officer, along with other mitigating factors and evidentiary issues. Our skilled defense team successfully argued for the dismissal of the OVI citation, and our client pled to a non-moving violation instead, avoiding the severe consequences of an OVI on her record and preventing high points from being assessed to her driver's license.

Our client faced accusations of contributing to the delinquency of a minor after being alleged to have permitted teenagers to drink alcohol and use marijuana at his residence. Upon thoroughly reviewing the case, we uncovered that the evidence was entirely insufficient, relying more on speculation and unfounded assumptions than concrete proof. Due to our diligent investigation and strategic defense, we successfully secured a complete dismissal of all charges.

Our client recently encountered a challenging situation after accepting a position with a new employer. During the interview, the employer assured her that the role would involve full-time hours and merchandising duties—areas in which she had prior experience. However, once she started the job, she learned that full-time hours were not guaranteed, and she was assigned to reset duties instead of merchandising. Despite accepting a significant pay cut for the position, our client took proactive steps to address these discrepancies by discussing her concerns with her supervisor, but the situation remained unresolved. Recognizing that the employer had breached its promises regarding hours and duties, the Hearing Officer concluded that a reasonable person in her position would have made the same decision to resign. Consequently, it was determined that she had just cause to quit, and her claim for unemployment benefits was approved. This case highlights the importance of holding employers accountable for their commitments and advocating for your rights in the workplace.

Our client, who previously worked in sales, faced an unexpected challenge while receiving unemployment benefits after her job ended. She was offered a part-time position at a local church supervising children during recess and lunch. Recognizing that this position was outside her career path and provided only limited hours, she declined the offer. Her unemployment benefits were subsequently denied. At the hearing, we argued that, under Ohio law, unemployment benefits can only be denied if the refusal of work was without good cause and if the job offer constituted suitable work. The hearing officer agreed with our position, concluding that the job offer did not align with her professional experience and did not provide sufficient hours to be considered "suitable work." Therefore, she had good cause to turn it down. As a result, our client was awarded her unemployment benefits. This case underscores the importance of understanding your rights when navigating unemployment claims.

When our client’s unemployment benefits application was denied by the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) due to alleged absenteeism, we knew there was more to the story. ODJFS had determined that her employer had just cause to terminate her, but our investigation revealed otherwise. By gathering and presenting thorough documentation, we demonstrated that her absences were due to a legitimate medical condition. At the hearing, the Hearing Officer agreed, ruling that our client was terminated through no fault of her own. As a result, her appeal was granted, and her unemployment benefits were approved and paid.

Our client was involved in a serious single-vehicle accident that caused her car to roll over, necessitating emergency assistance. Police broke a window to help her escape but quickly shifted their focus to an OVI investigation, even as paramedics and hospital staff provided critical medical care. Through our thorough investigation, we determined that the signs of impairment cited by authorities were more likely the result of trauma from the accident rather than alcohol or drug use. Consequently, the OVI charges were dismissed, and the client pleaded to a non-moving violation. This outcome protected her from license points, a lengthy suspension, an OVI conviction on her record, and increased auto insurance rates.

Our client was stopped by law enforcement under the claim that her temporary tag, displayed in the rear window, was not visible. Despite this minor issue, the officer alleged an odor of alcohol and noted watery eyes, prompting him to order her out of the vehicle for field sobriety tests. This led to an OVI charge. Recognizing the importance of protecting our client’s rights, we filed a motion to suppress evidence, challenging the validity of the traffic stop and questioning whether the officer lawfully expanded and prolonged the detention. Our thorough legal strategy resulted in the dismissal of the OVI charge, with our client instead pleading to a traffic citation. This resolution also spared her from the significant consequences of a license suspension.

When a state trooper alleged our client made an unsafe lane change and displayed signs of impairment, including bloodshot eyes, slurred speech, and the smell of alcohol, the case initially appeared challenging. Our client was subjected to field sobriety tests, arrested, and taken to the station, where an attempt to administer a breath test failed due to issues with the machine. However, through a thorough investigation, we discovered that many of the trooper's claims were contradicted by video evidence from the traffic stop. Armed with these inconsistencies, we successfully negotiated a dismissal of the OVI charges, with our client pleading to a non-moving violation instead. This outcome spared our client from license points, the lasting stigma of an OVI conviction, and the associated penalties.

When our client, a commercial driver, was stopped for allegedly crossing a marked line and subjected to an OVI investigation—including an over-the-limit breath test—we understood the stakes: his career and livelihood were on the line. Our team fought aggressively to secure an outcome that protected his commercial driver’s license. We achieved a complete dismissal of the OVI charge, a plea to a non-moving citation with no points, vacated the administrative license suspension, and avoided any court-imposed suspension. This resolution safeguarded his CDL and ensured his ability to continue his career without disruption.

After allegedly observing our client engaged in street racing, law enforcement quickly shifted their focus to an OVI investigation, administering field sobriety tests and later a breath test that registered above the legal limit. We challenged the rapid escalation of the traffic stop and raised multiple legal issues that called into question the validity of the investigation. As a result, the OVI charges were dismissed, and our client agreed to resolve the matter with minor traffic citations. This outcome spared our client from the severe consequences of an OVI conviction, including steep fines, significant license points, and a year-long license suspension.

After our client was accused of crossing a fog line twice while speeding and subsequently arrested for OVI with a breath test result over the legal limit, we conducted a thorough investigation into the case. By meticulously following a strategic approach, we were able to challenge the evidence and secure the best possible outcome for our client. As a result, the OVI charges were dismissed, and our client pled to a non-moving citation, avoiding points on his license, hefty fines, an OVI record, and a year-long license suspension.

Our client was stopped while operating a golf cart on a roadway and quickly subjected to field sobriety tests, which the officer suspiciously conducted out of view of his 180-degree dash camera. Through a thorough investigation, we raised significant doubts about the justification for the stop and challenged the officer's deliberate avoidance of objective video evidence. After heated negotiations with the prosecutor, we secured a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a simple traffic citation. This resolution spared him from high license points, a mandatory one-year license suspension, and the damaging impact of an OVI conviction on his career.

Our client was arrested for OVI following a minor fender bender, with a breath test allegedly over the legal limit. Despite the challenging circumstances, we successfully secured a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing the client to plead to minor traffic citations instead. This resolution spared him from an OVI conviction, significant points on his driving record, a potential year-long license suspension, mandatory jail time, and the possible loss of his job.

Our client faced a daunting array of charges, including two first-degree misdemeanors, five fifth-degree felonies, one third-degree felony, one second-degree felony, and one first-degree felony. Through thorough investigation and strategic legal representation, we meticulously examined the state's evidence—and the lack thereof—to negotiate a highly favorable outcome. As a result, all charges were dismissed except for a single misdemeanor. Our client avoided jail time entirely and walked out of court with only a $100 fine.

We successfully helped a client secure unemployment benefits after his employer terminated him for not completing a certification that wasn’t part of his original job. By proving to the Unemployment Review Commission that the employer’s demand was unreasonable and lacked just cause, we ensured our client received the financial relief he deserved.

Our client was terminated after raising workplace concerns and being confronted by a co-worker. During the exchange, our client stated he didn’t respect the co-worker but emphasized the importance of working together. The employer claimed this conversation was “harassment” and fired him, leading to a denial of unemployment benefits. We appealed and represented our client at a hearing, where we successfully demonstrated that his statements didn’t amount to misconduct. The hearing officer agreed, reversing the denial and ensuring our client received the benefits he deserved.

Our client was stopped by police for a minor traffic issue and subsequently asked to exit her vehicle to perform field sobriety tests. Despite her prior OVI conviction and a breath test result exceeding the legal limit, we strategically challenged the officer's investigation. We argued that the officer lacked sufficient evidence of impairment to justify removing her from the vehicle and that the field sobriety tests were not conducted in substantial compliance with standardized procedures. By focusing on these critical issues, we successfully secured a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead of facing a mandatory minimum jail sentence of ten days, our client resolved the matter with a non-moving traffic citation and avoided jail time altogether. This case highlights the importance of scrutinizing every aspect of an OVI investigation to ensure that our clients receive the best possible outcome.

Our client faced a challenging situation when the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) denied her unemployment benefits and demanded repayment of benefits she had already received. ODJFS claimed she was terminated with just cause. However, we demonstrated at a hearing that this was not the case. Despite being placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP) prior to her termination, our client never received notice of the PIP’s extension. Additionally, she had received a positive performance review after the PIP was implemented. We also highlighted that the employer failed to provide sufficient evidence of any fault on her part that would justify termination. The hearing officer ruled in our client’s favor. She was not only entitled to keep her prior benefits but also received the additional benefits she deserved.

Our elderly client was charged with an OVI after a minor fender bender, with police mistakenly attributing signs of aging to impairment. Recognizing the injustice, we conducted a thorough investigation into the accident and the police’s OVI evaluation, uncovering critical evidence that demonstrated this misinterpretation. Due to our diligent efforts and advocacy, the OVI charges were completely dismissed. Our client instead resolved the matter with a minor misdemeanor traffic citation and a $100 fine, avoiding the serious consequences of an OVI conviction.

Our client faced serious charges after a minor fender bender: leaving the scene of an accident. This first-degree misdemeanor carried penalties of up to 6 months in jail, a $1,000 fine, and a mandatory license suspension. Recognizing the severe impact on our client's life and livelihood, our legal team meticulously examined the case details. Through strategic defense and compelling advocacy, we secured a complete dismissal of all charges, protecting our client's record and driving privileges.

Our client was accused of committing multiple traffic violations, leading to an OVI arrest and a breath test showing results over the legal limit. However, our diligent investigation uncovered several issues with the initial traffic stop. We highlighted these issues in a suppression motion, which ultimately resulted in the dismissal of the OVI charges. Our client was able to resolve the case by pleading to a non-moving citation instead. This outcome spared him from the heavy license points associated with an OVI conviction and helped protect his career.

Our client was initially stopped for a minor traffic issue, yet soon found himself subjected to an OVI investigation despite insufficient indicators of impairment. After a thorough review of the state’s evidence, our legal team crafted a strong defense and successfully secured a dismissal of the OVI charges. Ultimately, our client resolved the matter by pleading to a simple traffic citation. This favorable outcome meant he avoided jail time, protected his record from an OVI conviction, and maintained his driving privileges without any license suspension.

Our client was involved in a minor accident, and when police arrived at the scene, they focused on investigating potential impairment rather than ensuring our client’s well-being. Despite being charged with an OVI (Operating a Vehicle Impaired), our dedicated legal team successfully negotiated a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, our client only needed to plead to a minor, non-moving citation, sparing her from the serious consequences associated with an OVI conviction. This outcome protected her record, prevented any points from being added to her license, and avoided a potential license suspension.

Our client initially faced a denial of unemployment benefits after her employer classified her as an independent contractor. However, there are strict guidelines that prevent employers from avoiding their obligations by misclassifying employees. For instance, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) considers twenty specific factors to assess whether an individual has been correctly classified. In this case, we presented compelling documentation and testimony that demonstrated our client’s true employment status. Ultimately, the hearing officer agreed with our position, recognizing the misclassification. As a result, our client prevailed in her hearing and secured her rightful benefits.

Years after our client received unemployment benefits, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) demanded repayment of nearly $20,000, claiming he was not unemployed when he applied for benefits. We thoroughly investigated the situation and represented him in a hearing with the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission. During the hearing, we demonstrated that, although our client held multiple part-time positions, he had, in fact, become unemployed from one of them. The hearing officer agreed, recognizing his status as partially unemployed, and ruled in his favor, overturning the repayment demand.

Our client was initially stopped for a minor issue: failing to display a license plate. However, the situation quickly escalated, with officers subjecting him to a pat-down, field sobriety tests, a roadside portable breath test, and an evidentiary breath test at the police station. Despite test results above the legal limit, our team focused on the improper escalation of what began as a routine traffic stop. Through our aggressive defense, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a non-moving citation. This outcome saved him from points on his license, avoided a license suspension, and prevented an OVI from appearing on his record.

Our client reached out to us after a distressing encounter with a police officer. She was seeking assistance when her car broke down, but instead of help, she felt treated unfairly, as though she were a criminal. Following the incident, she filed a formal complaint about the officer’s conduct. However, after reviewing the body camera footage, the police department alleged that her complaint included false statements, leading to her being charged with a first-degree misdemeanor. With our firm’s dedicated and strategic representation, we successfully negotiated for the dismissal of the first-degree misdemeanor charges. Ultimately, our client only needed to pay a $50 fine for a minor misdemeanor citation, protecting her record and restoring her peace of mind.

After being unjustly terminated, our client applied for unemployment benefits but was denied by ODJFS, which argued she was not medically able to work. We stepped in to support her case, helping her prepare for the hearing and representing her to demonstrate that, despite her medical restrictions, she was indeed capable of working. Thanks to our efforts, she won her hearing and secured the unemployment benefits she deserved.

When our client was injured and required time away from work to recover, her employer unexpectedly terminated her. Upon filing for unemployment benefits, she was dismayed to find her claim denied. We stepped in to represent her at a hearing, presenting clear evidence that her absence was due to a legitimate medical condition. Our advocacy led to a successful outcome—she won her unemployment benefits, ensuring the support she deserved.

Our client faced an OVI charge after a traffic stop, where a breath test indicated levels above the legal limit. Despite the initial evidence, we successfully secured a dismissal of the OVI charge, allowing him to plead to a non-moving violation instead. By keeping the OVI off his record, we helped him retain his job and avoid the long-term consequences of a serious offense.

When our client was stopped for speeding, the police swiftly escalated the stop into an OVI investigation, leading to OVI charges. We intervened and successfully achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a non-moving violation instead. This outcome protected our client’s record from the serious impact of an OVI charge.

Our client was found asleep in his parked vehicle, prompting police to approach for a wellness check. However, the situation quickly escalated into OVI charges. Through a determined and strategic defense, we achieved a dismissal of these charges, allowing our client to resolve the matter with a non-moving violation instead. This outcome protected our client’s record from the severe implications of an OVI.

What might be defined as a win can differ from case to case. For example, in this case our client was charged with a second-in-ten (4th lifetime) OVI with a refusal. As a result, he was facing a minimum of 20 day and maximum of 180 days in jail. Through strategic representation, we helped him to avoid any jail time by persuading the prosecutor and judge to treat the OVI as a first-in-ten. Although he still received an OVI, in his eyes the avoidance of any jail time was a big win.

Our client received an OVI citation, despite his last OVI incident being over 13 years ago. We argued that the police had misinterpreted signs of impairment, and through a strong defense, we secured a dismissal of the OVI charges. Our client was instead able to resolve the matter with a non-moving violation, preserving his record from the significant impact of a repeat OVI charge.

Our client called off work to support her sister battling cancer, only to be terminated by a new manager for not notifying her absence more than an hour before her shift—a recently implemented rule that hadn’t been communicated to her. We demonstrated this lack of prior notice, and as a result, we prevailed at her hearing, securing a fair outcome for our client.

Our client was terminated without any active disciplinary record after his employer claimed concern over a comment he allegedly made. However, the employer failed to address this concern with him before the termination. We highlighted this lack of communication, and as a result, we prevailed at his hearing, securing approval of his benefits.

After a minor fender bender in a drive-thru, our client was unexpectedly accused of an OVI by the police. We provided assertive representation, successfully obtaining a dismissal of the OVI charges. Our client resolved the matter with a non-moving violation, protecting her record from serious repercussions.

Our client faced new OVI charges after a breath test showed results above the legal limit, along with a prior OVI from several years ago. Through strategic representation, we secured a dismissal of the new OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a non-moving violation instead, protecting his record from further impact.

Our client faced OVI charges, but through assertive representation, we successfully achieved a dismissal of these charges. Instead, our client was able to resolve the matter with minor traffic citations, protecting his record from the impact of an OVI.

Our client was terminated for attendance issues, yet we demonstrated that these absences were due to a legitimate medical condition. Through our advocacy, our client prevailed in the case and was awarded the benefits they rightfully deserved.

When our client was charged with an OVI, we conducted thorough research and identified key issues with the traffic stop and subsequent OVI investigation. The arguments we presented led to a dismissal of the OVI charge, allowing our client to resolve the matter with a simple traffic citation instead.

Our client was initially denied unemployment benefits when ODJFS determined she lacked sufficient qualifying weeks. We gathered detailed documentation of her earnings and presented this evidence at a hearing, demonstrating that she did, in fact, meet the requirements. The hearing officer agreed, and we successfully won her case, securing the benefits she deserved.

Our client was informed she was being terminated for alleged performance issues but was given the option to resign instead. When she chose to resign, ODJFS initially ruled her ineligible for unemployment benefits. At the hearing, we demonstrated that this was a resignation in lieu of termination and should be considered a termination. We further showed that the employer lacked evidence to justify termination for cause. In the end, we won the hearing, securing our client the unemployment benefits she deserved.

Our client was employed at a company that recently experienced a cyberattack. During a phone conversation, our client described the incident, comparing the attack to hackers "throwing a grenade" into the system. Surprisingly, this metaphor led to his termination, as the employer alleged he had made a threat. In a hearing, we demonstrated that no threats were made, clarified the context, and argued that the termination lacked just cause. We successfully advocated for our client’s right to unemployment benefits, and the hearing officer agreed—resulting in a win for our client.

When our client faced OVI charges, we uncovered key issues in the case: missing video footage from the traffic stop and conflicting reports regarding the reason for the stop. Leveraging these inconsistencies, we successfully negotiated a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, our client resolved the matter with a plea to a non-moving citation, protecting their record and future.

Our client was initially stopped for a traffic violation, then given field sobriety tests, and ultimately charged with an OVI. We demonstrated that the so-called signs of impairment were, in fact, normal signs of aging, not intoxication. This clarity led to the dismissal of the OVI charges, with our client accepting a non-moving citation instead—preserving their record and peace of mind.

Our client, a commercial driver, faced an OVI charge that threatened his commercial driver’s license (CDL) and livelihood. We successfully achieved a dismissal of the OVI charge and vacated his administrative license suspension. By resolving the case with a minor traffic citation, our client avoided the OVI conviction, CDL disqualification, and potential job loss, securing his career and future.

Our client faced aggravated menacing charges following an alleged argument with a recreation center employee, during which there was an alleged reference to a gun. Through strategic and assertive representation, we achieved a complete dismissal of all charges, protecting our client’s record and reputation.

Our client came to us after her unemployment benefits were initially denied. Her employer argued that they had just cause to terminate her for using profanity in the workplace. However, the full story revealed a different perspective. During the hearing, we demonstrated that the situation had been provoked by a supervisor who was verbally aggressive, using profanities toward our client. Under these circumstances, our client simply responded, "watch your f###ing tone when you are talking to me." We argued that this response did not constitute grounds for termination. The Hearing Officer agreed with our position, finding that this did not justify the employer's action. Thanks to our advocacy, our client received her rightful benefits. We are proud to support employees facing unfair treatment and will fight to protect their rights in challenging situations.

Our client faced an unexpected challenge when he was placed on a performance improvement plan despite having no prior disciplinary record. Shortly after, he was terminated without any specific reason provided. When he initially filed for unemployment benefits, his claim was denied. Believing in his right to fair treatment, we appealed the decision and represented him in a hearing, presenting the facts that demonstrated his dedication and professionalism. Through our advocacy, we successfully won his benefits, ensuring he received the support he deserved.

Our client faced an OVI charge that threatened to leave a permanent mark on his record and result in a mandatory one-year license suspension. Through determined advocacy, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, reducing them to minor traffic citations. This outcome allowed our client to avoid an OVI conviction and keep his driving privileges intact. Our firm is committed to securing favorable resolutions and protecting our clients' futures.

When our client was asked by the ODJFS to repay the pandemic unemployment benefits she had rightly received, we stepped in to help. Through a strong appeal, we successfully defended her case, ensuring she could keep the benefits she deserved.

Our client was wrongly accused of fraud by the ODJFS for collecting unemployment compensation, leading to a demand for repayment. We appealed this determination, successfully clearing her of any fraud and eliminating the overpayment claim. At our firm, we are committed to defending our clients against unfounded accusations and safeguarding their rightful benefits.

Our client was pulled over for an alleged marked lanes violation, subjected to field sobriety tests, and later arrested with a request for a breath test, which he refused. By challenging the validity of the OVI investigation and field sobriety procedures, we successfully obtained a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, our client pled to a non-moving citation, sparing him from the long-term consequences of an OVI on his record and additional penalties.

Our client was unfairly terminated for a minor alleged infraction, despite a spotless disciplinary record. We guided her through the appeals process and represented her at the hearing, ultimately securing the unemployment benefits she deserved.

Our client faced a first-degree misdemeanor charge for driving under an OVI suspension, which included a mandatory three-day jail term and an additional one-year license suspension. Through our effective representation, we secured a dismissal of the serious charges, allowing our client to plead to a minor traffic citation with only a small fine.

Our client was charged with an OVI after registering a high-tier result on a breath test. Through creative strategy and aggressive representation, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a minor traffic citation instead.

Our client was charged with an OVI, but through our aggressive representation, the charges were dismissed, and his license was immediately reinstated.

Our client was initially approved for pandemic unemployment benefits, only for ODJFS to later demand repayment, alleging fraud. We appealed this determination, successfully clearing his name and ensuring he retained the benefits he was rightfully due.

Our client faced OVI charges after a breath test indicated a result over the legal limit. Through aggressive representation, we successfully achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges.

Our client, a dedicated teacher, intervened swiftly to protect students during an unexpected fight. Instead of commending his actions, his employer terminated him, critiquing his response for not seeking help first and second-guessing his intervention technique. We challenged this unfair decision, prevailed at the hearing, and successfully secured his unemployment benefits.

Our client was stopped by police, who mistook natural signs of aging for impairment. Although a subsequent urine test detected certain chemicals, we presented his case with determination and achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, our client pled to a non-moving citation, avoiding the impact of an OVI record.

Our client, employed through a temporary agency, was informed that his assignment had ended. Despite his repeated efforts to secure a new assignment, the agency claimed he failed to follow up and had therefore resigned. We represented him at a hearing, demonstrating that he was, in fact, unemployed through no fault of his own. As a result, he prevailed and received the unemployment benefits he rightfully deserved.

Our client faced OVI charges after a high breath test result. Through aggressive representation, we secured a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing him to plead to a non-moving citation instead. This outcome spared him from license points and a year-long suspension.

Our client faced OVI charges, but we identified key issues with the field sobriety tests conducted by the police. Through our challenge, we achieved a dismissal of her OVI charges, allowing her to plead to a non-moving citation instead.

ODJFS accused our client of fraud in receiving unemployment benefits, demanding repayment of alleged overpaid funds. We appealed this decision, successfully clearing our client of fraud and eliminating the overpayment claim.

Our client was stopped, arrested, and asked to take a breath test, which he refused. We stepped in, presenting strong arguments on his behalf that led to a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, he resolved the case with a traffic citation.

ODJFS accused another client of fraudulently receiving unemployment benefits, seeking repayment. We appealed this determination, prevailed, and eliminated the overpayment entirely.

Years after receiving unemployment benefits, our client was unexpectedly accused of fraud by ODJFS, with a demand for repayment. We represented him, successfully reversing these determinations and eliminating the claimed overpayment.

Our client provided a high-tier breath test sample, leading to OVI charges that threatened his career. Through aggressive representation, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing him to plead to a non-moving citation instead—safeguarding his job in the process.

Our client was fired after discussing his pay with his boss. While leaving, he allegedly used profanity, but we demonstrated at the hearing that this occurred after his termination. His conduct prior to being fired did not warrant termination, and we prevailed, securing his unemployment benefits.

Our client was put in an impossible position, receiving conflicting instructions from different supervisors and then being terminated for choosing which directive to follow. At the hearing, we demonstrated that the employer lacked just cause for termination, resulting in a favorable decision for our client.

Our client faced OVI charges after refusing a breath test. Through a thorough investigation, we uncovered critical issues in his case, resulting in a dismissal of the OVI charges. Instead, he resolved the matter with a non-moving citation.

Our client was pulled over for a license plate light issue and subsequently subjected to field sobriety tests in snowy conditions, resulting in an OVI charge. Through our representation, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing her to plead to a non-moving citation instead.

Our client was stopped after crossing the center line, subjected to field sobriety tests, and subsequently charged with an OVI. Through aggressive representation, including filing motions for discovery sanctions against the State and a suppression motion, we reached a resolution allowing our client to plead to a non-moving citation, resulting in the dismissal of the OVI charges.

Our client was placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP) and later terminated for supposedly not meeting performance expectations. At the hearing, we demonstrated that the employer lacked credible evidence to support these claims. As a result, we prevailed, and our client was approved for her unemployment benefits.

Our client was unfairly removed from her role as a Regional Sales Manager and reassigned to a warehouse position at a significantly reduced salary. Faced with this demotion, she chose to resign. Initially, ODJFS denied her unemployment claim, but we stepped in, represented her at the hearing, and demonstrated that she had just cause to resign. As a result, she successfully secured her benefits.

Our client faced domestic violence charges after a physical altercation with an adult sibling. With concerns about the potential consequences, he left these charges open with an outstanding warrant for several years. Once he retained our firm, we acted quickly to lift the warrant and successfully secured a dismissal of the charges.

ODJFS accused our client of fraudulently receiving unemployment compensation, demanding repayment of alleged overpayments. We appealed this determination and successfully had the fraud claims and overpayment demands removed.

Our client was accused of impaired driving with her children in the vehicle. Through a meticulous investigation, we uncovered critical issues with the State’s case, leading to a dismissal of the most serious charges. Instead, our client resolved the matter with a non-moving citation and a disorderly conduct charge.

Our client faced accusations of unemployment fraud, along with demands for alleged overpayments. We represented her at the hearing, where we successfully challenged these claims, resulting in the removal of both the fraud determination and overpayment demands.

Our client was initially stopped for an alleged loud exhaust, which quickly escalated into an OVI investigation, resulting in charges for driving over the legal blood alcohol limit. Through aggressive representation, we achieved a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to plead to a traffic offense instead.

Our client was terminated for allegedly missing a safety meeting without prior notice. At the hearing, we demonstrated that, even if true, this infraction did not warrant termination under the employer’s own policy. As a result, we prevailed, securing a favorable outcome for our client.

Another client was wrongly accused of unemployment fraud, facing a substantial overpayment demand from ODJFS. Through the appeal process, we successfully reversed the determination, eliminating the repayment claim and securing a fair outcome for our client.

After a traffic stop, our client was subjected to field sobriety tests and a breath test, which registered in the high-tier OVI range. Through a thorough investigation, we uncovered significant issues with the breath test procedure. Leveraging these findings, we successfully obtained a dismissal of the OVI charges, allowing our client to resolve the case with a non-moving citation instead.